PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Current Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of the mindset in fitness scale (MiFS): a domain-specific measure of implicit beliefs in physical activity engagement

BDBenjamin Holen DybendalSSSigbjørn StokkeJHJan Arvid Haugan

Key Points

  • To create and validate a scale that measures implicit beliefs about fitness and physical activity engagement.
  • Developed a two-dimensional scale for fitness mindsets based on existing theories.
  • Conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on a sample of 297 Norwegian university students.
  • Assessed reliability and convergent validity through correlations with related variables.
  • Confirmed a two-factor structure with six items on the scale.
  • Demonstrated good reliability and validity in measuring fitness mindsets.
  • Found that more frequent workouts correlated with a higher growth mindset and a lower fixed mindset.

Abstract

Mindset theory has attracted significant attention across many fields of learning, including motivation for physical activity. However, no scale exists to measure mindsets regarding fitness. Drawing on theory and scales from other domains, we develop a two-dimensional scale of mindset for fitness. In a sample of Norwegian university students (N = 297), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor solution comprising six items. The scale demonstrated good reliability and convergent validity through unique relations with theoretically related variables, such as learned helplessness, personality mindset, and implicit beliefs about intelligence. More frequent workouts were associated with a higher growth mindset and a lower fixed mindset. We conclude that the Mindset in Fitness Scale (MiFS) is a valid instrument in the physical activity and fitness domain; however, given the restricted sample in this validation study, psychometric evaluations in larger, more diverse samples are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dybendal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be361e6e48c4981c674c8dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09286-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper