Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research demonstrates the ATF5-GPER1 axis enhances survival in females with HCC, suggesting new therapeutic prospects.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits marked sexual dimorphism, with females demonstrating superior survival, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We integrated bulk transcriptomics (GSE39791, TCGA-LIHC, GSE14520) and single-cell RNA sequencing (five datasets, n = 58 patients, 238,982 cells) with machine learning (LASSO, SVM, random forest) to identify female-protective genes driving HCC disparities. Activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5) emerged as a female-protective gene with higher expression in females versus males across cohorts. Single-cell analyses revealed ATF5 defines a female-enriched, low-grade malignant subcluster with elevated apoptotic programs and reduced proliferative signaling, and pseudotime analysis showed coordinated ATF5-GPER1 downregulation during malignant progression (Spearman ρ = -0.52 and -0.48; both p < 0.001). In the immune compartment, ATF5 marked a female-enriched IFN-γ⁺ macrophage state with enhanced immunostimulatory programs and preferential CXCL9/10-CXCR3-mediated communication with CD8/NK cells. Mechanistically, ATF5 transcriptionally activates G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1), forming an estrogen-responsive regulatory module that functionally suppresses proliferation, induces apoptosis (HepG2: 26.45% vs. 11.88%, p < 0.0001), and inhibits migration in a GPER1-dependent manner as demonstrated by rescue experiments. Tissue microarray validation (n = 167) confirmed high ATF5 expression predicts improved recurrence-free survival specifically in female patients (HR = 0.34, p = 0.040) but not males (p = 0.080). The ATF5-GPER1 axis represents a female-protective circuit operating through tumor-intrinsic suppression and immune remodeling, offering mechanistic insight into HCC sexual dimorphism and identifying ATF5 as a sex-specific prognostic biomarker with potential therapeutic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: