Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive study shows later KRT timing increases in septic shock patients, implying shifts in treatment approaches.
Background Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) timing in septic shock remains debated. We assessed temporal trends in KRT initiation and outcomes in Japan. Methods Using a nationwide EMR database (2016–2023), we included adults (≥ 20 years) with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or high‐dependency care unit (HDU) on day 0 who received KRT. Outcomes were KRT timing by hospital day, in‐hospital mortality, and KRT dependency at discharge; sensitivity analyses used consistently reporting hospitals. Results Among 688 hospitalizations (median age 74 years), KRT initiation shifted later, with day ≥ 2 initiation reaching 38.5% in 2023. In 2022, mortality was 54.3% ( n = 25), and KRT dependency was 43.5% ( n = 20). Patterns were similar across modalities/settings. Conclusions KRT initiation shifted toward later timing after 2022. Studies with granular severity and indication data are needed to clarify drivers of variation and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: