Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines foveal light exposure's impact on visual processing in humans, implying short flashes affect vision minimally.
The effects of fovea) exposure to near maximum permissible levels of broad‐band light from lamps of differing flash durations and visual angle subtense on steady‐state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP's) were measured in four human volunteers. SSVEP's in response to a counterphasing checkerboard pattern were recorded with a two‐phase vector voltmeter used as an analog fourier analyzer and were averaged across repeated presentation of the flash from each lamp. Two microsecond flashes of approximately 0.4° have minimal, although significant effects on early visual processing of a 2.77° diameter 6/24 (20/80) target. Five hundred microsecond flashes of equivalent size have greater effects; larger flashes (11.3,° 500 μs) produced afterimages that totally obscured the target for approximately 3.4 s and also reduced the SSVEP to near zero. Recovery of the SSVEP was subjectively correlated with afterimage duration rather than target obscuration. Therefore, single short small retinal image flashes may have minimal transient effects on photopic suprathreshold vision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elmar T. Schmeisser (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: