Qualitative analysis reveals how BIPOC journalists navigate safety in broadcast news, implying a need for equitable practices.
This article examines how newsroom routines shape the health, safety, and professional experiences of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) journalists in U.S. broadcast news. While journalistic norms of objectivity and neutrality often frame risk as evenly shared, this study situates safety within routine newsroom practices to show how risk and institutional support are unevenly distributed, particularly during high-stakes coverage such as protests, door-knocks, and politically charged events. The analysis draws on qualitative, in-depth interviews conducted as part of a larger study on journalists’ identities and definitions of fairness and applies a critical framework attentive to power and postcolonial influences in newsroom organizations. Findings indicate that BIPOC journalists routinely navigate tensions between production demands and personal safety, with their lived experiences in the field frequently diverging from the assumptions of white colleagues and newsroom leadership. Participants describe adapting newsroom routines by setting boundaries, asserting professional judgment, and challenging unsafe expectations. These practices illuminate how newsroom routines are both sites of constraint and negotiation. This article concludes that attention to identity and power within newsroom routines is essential for understanding how fairness, safety, and ethical practice are enacted in contemporary broadcast journalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristina Vera-Phillips (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: