A report compares outcomes of fitting flexible contact lenses in wearers, highlighting implications for quality of care.
Fifty‐eight patients were fitted with both the Griffin Naturalens and the Bausch and Lomb Softens™. A comparison of the two types of flexible contact lenses shows advantages to each. More patients were fitted successfully with the Naturalens and its required less time to fit initially: the Soflens is less expensive to maintain, more durable, easier and simpler to handle, less time consuming to maintain, more stable, and requires less in office time in the long run.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. E. Josephson (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: