Comparative assessment evaluates predator efficiency in managing Liposcelis decolor, suggesting biological control options.
Psocids are difficult to manage using insecticides, hence the need for alternatives including biological control. Evaluation of data from two separate studies was conducted. One study investigated the potential of Cheyletus eruditus (Shrank) (Trombidiformes: Cheyletidae) and Cheyletus malaccensis Oudemans to manage Liposcelis decolor (Pearman) (Psocodea: Liposcelididae), whereas the other investigated the potential of Xylocoris flavipes (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to do the same. Temperature and relative humidity conditions were similar in both studies. However, the five predator–prey (P-P) ratios for the mites (0:20, 1:20, 2:20, 4:20 and 10:20) were different from those of X. flavipes (0:240, 1:240, 2:240, 3:240 and 5:240). The three predators demonstrated significant prey suppression; however, the level of control by X. flavipes was higher compared to the mites. At optimal prey conditions of 32 °C and 75% RH, all predators maintained high suppression. Temperature significantly influenced progeny production, with high reproduction observed at 20 and 24 °C for the Cheyletus spp. and at 28 and 32 °C for X. flavipes. Relative humidity of 63% was detrimental to Cheyletus spp. progeny production. While the results from this evaluation for the purpose of comparison should be interpreted cautiously, the different performances of the predators provide valuable insights for biological control of stored-product psocids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosomtwe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: