This framework enhances explainable credit card fraud detection, validating reliability and ensuring trustworthy insights.
We propose Trust Triangle, a Bridging Methodology that establishes evidential reliability through multi-attribution consensus, ensures external validity via statistical hypothesis testing, and enables controlled generation with RAG-anchored LLMs to transform black-box predictions into trustworthy, auditable explanations. This framework is instantiated for credit card fraud detection by integrating multi-method feature attributions with rigorous statistical validation. The resulting reliability-validity-verified insights are synthesized with high-relevance domain knowledge (relevance score > 0.7) retrieved from a real-world corpus via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). A structured Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompt then guides an LLM to produce coherent, audit-ready case reports. Our contributions are threefold: (1) a verifiable framework for quantifying attribution reliability and validity, (2) a demonstrated end-to-end pipeline from robust prediction to semantically grounded explanation, and (3) a generalizable paradigm for Trustworthy ML in high-stakes domains. Experiments on a highly imbalanced dataset (fraud rate: 8.74%) demonstrate robust performance (PR-AUC = 0.7867), successfully identify statistically significant predictive features, and generate audit-ready reports, thereby advancing a rigorous, evidence-based pathway from model output to decision-ready support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: