This essay argues democracy's decline is predictable, suggesting the need for a historical perspective in political science.
Barely a generation ago, democratic optimism reigned; today it has given way to deep pessimism about democracy’s future. Critics charge political science with failing to anticipate this reversal. This essay argues that democracy’s current difficulties were predictable, if not widely predicted. Although many contemporary theories struggled to explain recent developments, historically grounded approaches and earlier theories of democratic stability would have highlighted the risks of backsliding, including in Western and particularly U.S. democracy. By moving away from deep historical analysis and neglecting the insights of an earlier generation of democratic theorists, the field was left less prepared to recognize warning signs of global democratic decline and institutional fragility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheri Berman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: