Investigation explores anisotropic compact objects' properties, highlighting implications for stellar configurations.
In this investigation, we present a singularity-free interior solution of the Einstein field equation for a class of anisotropic compact objects in dimensions [Formula: see text]. In accordance with the concept of Vaidya and Tikekar, the geometry of the physical [Formula: see text]-space of a star corresponding to [Formula: see text] hypersurface is assumed to be a [Formula: see text] spheroid. For the fulfilment of the causality condition, a bound on the spheroidal parameter ([Formula: see text]) is noted depending on the values of the amount of anisotropy ([Formula: see text]) and space-time dimensions ([Formula: see text]). We note that by switching off the extra parameters ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), the previously obtained limit of [Formula: see text] can be generated. To validate our findings, we compare the results obtained from our model with observational data of PSR J1614-2230 (mass=[Formula: see text], radius=[Formula: see text]) and PSR J0740+6620 (mass=[Formula: see text], radius= [Formula: see text]). It is noted that the best-fit equation of state corresponds to a polynomial equation of state of the order of five. We use this finding to develop a density-dependent B in the MIT bag model, which seems to be useful for the correct description of compact objects in our model. The mass radius relation shows that our model mimics a wide range of recently observed pulsars in four and higher dimensions. It is noted that, in the case of a superdense compact object, the number of space-time dimensions cannot be taken large, which is a different result from that of the braneworld model. However, with density-dependent B, the present model permits any number of space-time dimensions ([Formula: see text]) to describe a stellar configuration. Furthermore, we also found that our model exhibits stability according to the generalised TOV equation, the Herrera cracking condition, and the adiabatic index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goswami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: