Investigates irrigation management in industrial hemp based on hydraulic properties, suggesting improved efficiency in water use.
Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is versatile and rapidly developing, offering new prospects to producers as a multipurpose crop, yet limited water availability in the Mediterranean area due to climate change makes its sustainable management challenging. Although the plant’s water requirements have been studied, a significant gap remains regarding irrigation management based on the hydraulic properties that govern water movement. The present study elucidates the role of soil hydraulic parameters in water dynamics within the rhizosphere of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L., ‘Felina 32’). For this purpose, a pot experiment of three irrigation treatments (100% FC, 80% FC, 60% FC; FC is the field capacity) was set up using two different soil types (clay loam CL and sandy clay loam SCL). SCL soil showed a higher Cmax of about 4 cm−1 compared to the Cmax of 0.11 cm−1 of CL soil, but dropped drastically within a narrow frame of soil moisture. CL soil resulted in about 12-fold higher diffusivity (Dmax ≈ 0.23 cm2 min−1) within a wider range of soil moisture compared to the SCL soil (Dmax ≈ 0.02 cm2 min−1), which facilitated water redistribution at CL, allowing the plant to maximize its water uptake, even at the lowest water input. As a result, the CL soil allowed more flexible scheduling and in contrast, SCL soil necessitated a high frequency irrigation protocol. The integration of hydraulic properties into irrigation planning revealed the potential of CL to apply water to plants efficiently across full and deficit irrigation, showing the peak performance of the irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) (0.929 g/mm) under the 60% FC regime. The findings provide a framework for linking soil physics–agricultural hydraulics with irrigation strategies in controlled environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angelaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: