Key result
Splicing dysregulation presents chamber-wide in DCM but remains restricted to the LV in ICM.
Why the study?
The extent to which splicing defects contribute to heart failure mechanisms and their spatial distribution across cardiac chambers remained incompletely understood.
Alternative splicing dysregulation in end-stage heart failure represents a shared molecular response to advanced cardiac remodeling, with spatial patterns reflecting the underlying etiology (diffuse in DCM vs. focal in ICM).
Should not yet change HF practice; extends splicing dysregulation as shared response to remodeling with etiology-specific spatial patterns.
Background Alternative splicing is essential for cardiac development and function, and its dysregulation has been linked to heart failure (1). While splicing defects have been reported in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)(2,3), the extent of their contribution to disease mechanisms and their spatial distribution across cardiac chambers remain incompletely understood. Purpose This study aimed to characterise genome-wide splicing alterations in DCM and ICM, and to determine whether these changes act as disease drivers or represent consequences of pathological remodelling, with a focus on their distribution across distinct cardiac regions. Methods RNA sequencing was performed on left ventricular (LV) samples from patients with end-stage heart failure due to DCM (n=10), ICM (n=11), and non-failing controls (n=5). Splicing events were analysed using three complementary bioinformatic tools. Six candidate events in genes with established roles in cardiac physiology were validated by quantitative PCR across an extended cohort (54 DCM, 45 ICM, 23 controls) and three cardiac regions: LV, right ventricle (RV), and interventricular septum (IVS). Motif enrichment analysis was conducted to explore potential splicing regulators. Results RNA-seq revealed widespread splicing dysregulation in heart failure compared to controls, with extensive overlap between DCM and ICM. Validation confirmed consistent alterations in CAMK2D and PDLIM3 across LV, RV, and IVS in both conditions. By contrast, splicing events in MYL6, ESRRG, EYA4, and SORBS1 displayed distinct patterns: in DCM they were altered across all cardiac chambers, whereas in ICM they were largely confined to the LV. Motif analysis implicated the RNA-binding protein QKI as a potential regulator of the observed splicing changes. Conclusions This study provides the first comprehensive multi-chamber analysis of splicing in human heart failure, identifying reproducible alterations shared between DCM and ICM as part of a common response to advanced cardiac remodelling. Distinct spatial patterns emerged, with DCM showing diffuse chamber-wide dysregulation and ICM displaying LV-restricted alterations consistent with focal ischaemic injury. These findings support the view that splicing dysregulation represents a shared molecular response to advanced cardiac remodelling, rather than a driver of aetiology-specific pathology, while also highlighting its role as a hallmark of end-stage heart failure and a basis for linking chamber-specific molecular profiles with clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furtado et al. (2026) studied this question. Splicing dysregulation in heart failure presents as diffuse chamber-wide alterations in dilated cardiomyopathy, but remains largely restricted to the left ventricle in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: