This work demonstrates a novel framework for real-time security filtering in text-to-video generation, suggesting improvements in copyright protection.
Current security solutions predominantly rely on cloud-based implementations, often neglecting computational resource constraints and operational efficiency. While contemporary methodologies typically require additional training, the few that operate without retraining frequently yield suboptimal performance. To address these limitations, this work leverages a pre-trained MTCNN architecture to detect faces of copyright-protected individuals. We construct a facial landmark database comprising five critical fiducial points, which serves as a supplementary module integrated into the stable diffusion framework, enabling real-time security filtering for synthesized video content. The proposed system utilizes MTCNN models pre-trained in the cloud to build a repository of copyrighted facial signatures, generating a geometric parameter database of facial landmarks. This database, coupled with a parallel verification unit, functions as a plugin within the standard Stable Diffusion pipeline. By leveraging Stable Diffusion’s native decoder, we decode stochastic frames from the U-Net latent representations and perform real-time comparative analysis to identify potential copyright violations in generated video sequences. Upon detecting an infringement, an on-screen display (OSD) alert notifies the user and immediately halts the text-to-video (T2V) generation process. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that our framework effectively mitigates the resource constraints and latency issues inherent in edge deployment scenarios of prior security implementations. Leveraging MTCNN’s proven robustness and extensive edge compatibility for facial recognition, the proposed detection and obfuscation plugin integrates seamlessly with Stable Diffusion while preserving generation quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: