Despite advances in remote sensing, vineyard yield prediction often suffers from limited multi-source data integration, low spatial resolution, and a lack of reproducibility in Mediterranean environments. This study addresses these gaps by presenting an innovative, standardized methodology that integrates multi-temporal satellite data (Sentinel-2, PlanetScope, and VHR), high-resolution UAV imagery (1–3 cm 2 ), and soil property measurements with machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve yield prediction and crop management. The research was conducted in a 9.2 ha experimental vineyard in Villamena, Granada (Spain). A statistically significant difference was detected between vegetation indices obtained from different sensors ( p < .05), highlighting that sensor type strongly affects the measured index values. Vegetation indices and soil variables were analyzed using advanced ML algorithms (KNN, SVM, DT, and RF) to identify key patterns influencing crop vigor and performance. Model evaluation metrics included Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Among the tested models, KNN achieved the highest accuracy, particularly when using PlanetScope imagery ( r = .9988, RMSE = 0.0105). The findings demonstrate the practical value of data integration: UAVs provide precise, site-specific monitoring during key growth phases, while satellite imagery supports broader temporal and spatial coverage. By applying this methodology, farmers and agronomists can make informed decisions regarding fertilization, irrigation, and harvest timing, optimizing resource use and enhancing sustainability. Furthermore, the developed models are transferable to other Mediterranean vineyard regions. This work provides a concise framework for implementing precision viticulture strategies, bridging the gap between advanced remote sensing analytics and actionable agricultural management.
González-Vivar et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: