Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines agricultural training programs' impact on class differentiation in rural China, suggesting a shift towards capital-focused skill distribution.
This study adopts Marxist class analysis and techno‐political perspective as its core framework, drawing on deskilling/reskilling theories to examine four government‐led/enterprise‐led farmer training programmes and their impact on rural class differentiation amid agricultural capitalization. Historically, the mass‐oriented training during the Mao era pursued universal skill empowerment and mitigated rural stratification. In contrast, the shift toward a professional elite‐focused model since the reform era has replicated the capitalist division of labour between ‘concept’ and ‘execution’ in agricultural production. Governments implement a classified training strategy, using targeted programmes to shape specialized households into production managers and smallholder households into skilled labourers. Meanwhile, enterprise‐led training erodes smallholders' inherent production experience through deskilling by fostering consumers and raw material suppliers that align with capitalist demands, and it develops standardized labourers through targeted reskilling. This process essentially constitutes capital's covert domination through skill restructuring: Skills are fragmented and transformed into tools for capital accumulation and instruments of labour control. With training centred on capital's needs and the inequitable distribution of skills shaped by capital logic, rural class relations have undergone profound reshaping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: