This paper departs from a question that, at some level, everyone has already asked: why do weaccept certain things as natural when they were, in fact, invented? The money we use, the bankswe trust, the rules we follow without questioning. Building on this, the article proposes a threelevel model of human consciousness and connects it to the emergence of Bitcoin, arguing thatboth phenomena share a common root: the tension between heteronomy and autonomy. Thetripartite model describes the transition from a victim state (Level 1), characterized by theuncritical acceptance of inherited structures, to critical agency (Level 2), in which the individualrecognizes that the world is constructed and can therefore be reconstructed, and finally to aconsciousness oriented toward the collective good (Level 3). On this philosophical foundation,the paper analyzes Bitcoin: its emergence in the context of the 2008 financial crisis, its technicalfoundations (blockchain, proof of work, finite supply of 21 million units), the 2024 and 2025milestones that consolidated its position in the global financial system, and its distinction fromcentral bank digital currencies. The conclusion is that consciously adopting Bitcoin is notmerely a financial decision: it is the practical expression of a subjectivity that has alreadyovercome dependence on external intermediaries. To make the concepts accessible withoutsacrificing analytical rigor, the text uses everyday examples and draws on philosophersincluding Kant, Sartre, Berger and Luckmann, Hegel, and Foucault.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaique Dias De Assis Oliveira
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kaique Dias De Assis Oliveira (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69be371c6e48c4981c6767b0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19103056