Conceptual framework compares big data analytics adoption in SMEs, suggesting country-specific strategies.
HRMARS - Purpose: A lack of widespread adoption of Big Data Analytics (BDA) in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) results from implementation hurdles and difficulties. Different conditions of each country will make a difference in BDA adoption. This paper proposes a conceptual framework of BDA adoption on the Technology, Organization, and Environment (TOE) framework. The proposed model will be able to explain the differences in BDA adoption determinants between countries. Design/methodology/approach: The Partial Least Square (PLS) with Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) technique must be employed to test and analyze the proposed model. Findings: The findings are not pertinent as this is a conceptual paper. Research limitations/implications: Although this paper has the potential to quantitatively explain the disparities in BDA adoption among countries, which are currently lacking, it has not yet been empirically verified. Practical implications: This paper offers practical implications for SMEs, BDA vendors, and the government in effectively formulating strategies for BDA adoption. Originality/value: This paper contributes significantly to the literature on BDA adoption in SMEs by proposing a comparative study between countries and highlighting the importance of environment factors (competitive pressure and government regulation) as moderators of the TOE framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kesumahati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: