Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This prospective observational study develops and validates an OSATS tool for assessing knot-tying skills, indicating its effectiveness for surgical trainees.
Proficiency in surgical knot tying is a fundamental skill for surgical trainees, yet objective assessment tools are limited. This study aimed to develop and provide initial reliability and validity evidence for a unified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool tailored for open surgical knot-tying across multiple knot types. A prospective observational study was conducted with fifty medical students at Vajira Hospital. All participants received structured simulation-based training using the Modified Peyton’s Four-Step Approach, covering Square, Surgeon’s, Aberdeen, and Roeder knots. Each participant performed three repetitions of each knot on a synthetic tissue model. Performances were video-recorded and assessed by two experienced surgeons using a newly developed OSATS tool consisting of a General Technical Skills (GTS) checklist and a Global Rating Scale (GRS). Reliability and validity were statistically analysed. The unified OSATS tool demonstrated inter- and intra-rater reliability. Mean global rating scores did not significantly differ across knot types (p = 0.217), providing initial internal structure evidence across knot types. Student feedback indicated high acceptability and perceived learning confidence following the structured training programme. This unified OSATS tool provides a reliable and practical framework for assessing open surgical knot-tying skills. As implemented within a structured training programme, the tool appears feasible for formative assessment in novice learners. Broader application with additional raters, objective performance metrics (e.g., time and errors), and multi-institutional samples is recommended to strengthen validity evidence and generalisability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanoksin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: