Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review compares nonoperative treatment and appendectomy effectiveness in children, indicating higher risks for nonoperative approaches.
Nonoperative treatment (NOT) has emerged as a potential alternative to surgery for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children; although short-term outcomes are often favourable, concerns remain regarding the durability of treatment, the incidence of complications, and long-term failure. Updated meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may help clarify the comparative safety and effectiveness versus appendectomy. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of NOT compared with appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in children using the highest level of available evidence. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science was conducted. Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 randomized clinical trials including 1480 children and adolescents, NOT (nonoperative antibiotic treatment) was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment failure at 1 year and an increased incidence of major complications compared to appendectomy. Although NOT resulted in a modestly faster return to school and daily activities, this benefit may be offset by higher rates of readmission and reintervention. Conclusion: Although NOT offers a shorter initial recovery, higher failure rates and major complications limit its role as a primary treatment strategy. The data suggest that appendectomy offers better outcomes in children and adolescents with uncomplicated appendicitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgiev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: