Evaluates a novel non-rectangular BRB system's seismic performance, suggesting improvements in load capacity and material use.
Conventional buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) with rectangular steel tube confinement suffer from stress concentration and inefficient material utilization, limiting their seismic performance. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel non-rectangular concrete-filled steel tube BRB system incorporating elliptical and corrugated cross-sections. Comprehensive finite element simulations using ABAQUS are conducted to systematically investigate the influence of key geometric parameters—wall thickness (1–14 mm), corner radius (40–55 mm), and corrugation angle (30–75°)—on hysteretic behavior, load-bearing capacity, and failure modes. The results demonstrate that optimized non-rectangular sections achieve load-bearing capacity comparable to conventional rectangular designs (e.g., elliptical section with 12 mm wall thickness reaches 10.02 MN, a 75% increase over 1 mm thickness) while significantly improving material efficiency. Corrugated sections exhibit enhanced weak-axis performance, with equivalent viscous damping ratios exceeding the NIST-recommended threshold of 0.25. Parametric analyses reveal that wall thickness above 12 mm yields diminishing returns; corner radius reduction to 40 mm triggers local buckling yet increases peak capacity; and corrugation angles exceeding 50° induce instability. All non-buckling models satisfy AISC compression strength adjustment factor requirements (β ≤ 1.3). This study systematically evaluates non-rectangular BRB geometries, filling a critical gap in the literature and providing design guidelines that leverage shape optimization to enhance both seismic resilience and material economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: