Multicenter cohort study reveals increased adverse perinatal outcomes in RhD-negative women, indicating health inequities.
Although hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) has become rare in high-income countries, it remains a significant cause of perinatal death in low-and middle-income countries. Nonetheless, true epidemiological data in Africa are lacking. To obtain insight into the prevalence of anti–Rhesus D -mediated HDFN in Ethiopia, pregnancy outcomes were compared between RhD-negative and RhD-positive women. A multicenter facility-based retrospective cohort study was performed on 6,796 women who gave birth (≥28 weeks of gestation) in 13 Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System hospitals from January to March 2024. Data were retrospectively collected from maternal and neonatal medical records from antenatal care to birth and neonatal registry. The composite adverse perinatal outcomes (APO) included stillbirth, neonatal loss, or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission. The likelihood of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn was based on clinical review by three experts blinded to the maternal blood group. In 6,141 of 6,796 women with known RhD status, 327 (5.3%) were RhD-negative. APO was seen in 13.3% women, and occurred twice as often in RhD-negative, as compared to RhD-positive women (aOR =2.3; 95% CI: 1.7-2.9). Clinical signs were highly suggestive of HDFN in 5.8% of RhD-negative women, as compared to 0.2% in RhD-positive women (p <0.0001). Our study identifies that RhD-negative women experience a twofold increased odds of APO, most likely due to HDFN. This highlights the need for strategies to address these maternal and child health inequities, including using anti-RhD immunoprophylaxis to prevent HDFN and screening for blood group antibodies to identify pregnancies at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desalew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: