The study demonstrates how integrating storage and user engagement enhances energy adequacy in buildings, suggesting systemic design is crucial.
The global shift toward renewable energy systems raises major challenges related to the variability of solar and wind power and their poor alignment with electricity demand. This paper addresses energy adequacy, defined as the ability of an energy system to reliably meet demand by balancing generation, storage, transmission, and reserves for unforeseen events. Within this framework, energy storage systems are identified as strategic components, requiring a diversified and multi-scale set of solutions-from territorial to building scale-to respond to infrastructural constraints and user behaviour. The study adopts a multi-scalar and interdisciplinary methodology combining deductive and inductive approaches. The deductive analysis examines global, European, and Italian electricity systems, highlighting issues such as overcapacity and grid instability caused by the uncoordinated development of renewable generation and network infrastructures. The inductive approach focuses on existing storage technologies, with particular attention to two types of thermal energy storage selected for their simplicity, scalability, and replicability. Hydropower reservoirs are also considered due to their multifunctional role in energy balancing. Two case studies developed by the research group—a public building energy retrofit in Milan and a modular off-grid housing prototype—demonstrate how integrated storage solutions can enhance system flexibility. The results emphasize the necessity of a systemic design approach that combines storage technologies, adaptable energy use, and active user participation to ensure energy adequacy in scenarios with high renewable penetration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: