This article investigates quality control processes in infrastructure projects in Algeria, highlighting legal and procedural implications.
Investment in infrastructure plays a crucial role in driving economic growth and improving quality of life in any country. Thus, assessing the progress and success of infrastructure projects is essential. This article investigates the quality control procedures involved in completing infrastructure projects in Algeria, focusing on a 600-meter road development project from the main post office in Ngoussa to the Loussif Abdelkader Library. It explores the conceptual framework of quality control in infrastructure, detailing the administrative, financial, and project oversight procedures. Employing a case study methodology, the research provides in-depth insights and utilises an institutional legal approach to analyse the Public Procurement Law and its implications. The findings indicate that the Algerian legal framework offers comprehensive guidelines for monitoring infrastructure projects, reflecting a political commitment to enhancing services that impact overall quality of life. The article emphasises the crucial role of engineering firms in overseeing project progress, contingent on the contracting authority’s commitment to effective monitoring. Additionally, it highlights the necessity for thorough pre-project studies and recommends updating quality control standards to align with current technological advancements, refining governance structures, and promoting public participation. This article underscores the critical importance of quality control in infrastructure execution, as these projects are fundamental to socioeconomic development and quality of life enhancement. It also serves as a valuable reference for experts in the field, identifying areas for improvement and offering insights into optimising quality control procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bensekirifa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: