Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of early X-ray emission in merger-driven gamma-ray bursts enhances understanding of emission mechanisms and gravitational wave detection.
Early X-ray emission of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) traces the transition between the prompt emission and the afterglow radiation, and its rapid flux decline is often interpreted as the tail of the prompt emission. As such, the early X-ray radiation can offer insights into the emission mechanisms active during the prompt emission and the physics of GRB jets. In this work, we focus on merger-driven GRBs, which are sources of gravitational waves (GWs) detectable by ground-based interferometers, such as LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA. We present a systematic analysis of the early X-ray emission (t < 10^3 s) of a sample of 16 merger-driven GRB candidates detected by the . We performed a time-resolved spectral analysis of soft and hard X-ray data (0.3-150 keV) by fitting two curved spectral models to the spectra: a physical synchrotron model and an empirical smoothly broken power-law model. We characterized the evolution of the peak energy and bolometric flux and derived the intrinsic properties of the ten bursts with measured redshift. We discovered a tight correlation between the rest-frame peak energy of the spectra and the isotropic-equivalent luminosity. Specifically, we obtained ν_ Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory c,z ∝ L_ ̊m iso ^ (0.68 ± 0.04) when adopting the synchrotron model and E_ p,z ∝ L_ ̊m iso ^ (0.58 ± 0.03) when adopting the smoothly broken power law. Both relations were extrapolated to the typical prompt emission energies and adequately describe the properties of short GRBs detected in teh MeV gamma rays. These results suggest a common origin for the prompt and steep-decay emissions in merger-driven GRBs and rule out high-latitude emission as the dominant process shaping the early X-ray tails. Finally, we assessed the detectability of these sources with the on board the Einstein Probe mission, and we discuss the implications for targeted GW searches in temporal and spatial coincidence with X-ray transients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ierardi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: