Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares clinical features of single and co-mutation VHL syndrome patients, highlighting implications for management.
Purpose von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome-related renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most prevalent hereditary RCC and exhibits clinical heterogeneity, complicating patient management. While VHL gene inactivation is the primary driver, the impact of co-occurring germline mutations in other renal cancer predisposition genes on clinical phenotype remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether such co-mutations define a distinct clinical and molecular subgroup of patients with VHL syndrome. Methods 115 patients with VHL syndrome were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent germline sequencing of a 39-gene panel for hereditary RCC. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of the VHL gene were identified, and patients were stratified into a VHL single-mutation group and a VHL co-mutation group. Clinical characteristics, tumour manifestations, renal lesion growth kinetics and age-related tumour risks were compared. Results 42.6% of patients harboured germline co-mutations. The co-mutation group exhibited a greater proportion of symptomatic patients (95.9% vs 78.7%, p=0.012) and increased penetrance of RCC (79.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.013) and pancreatic cystic tumours (77.6% vs 48.5%, p=0.002). This group had a lower incidence of positive family history (40.8% vs 69.7%, p=0.002). Co-mutation status is an independent predictor for RCC development (HR 1.798, p=0.016), and their RCC lesions exhibited significantly faster linear (0.376 cm/year vs 0.225 cm/year, p=0.022) and volumetric (3.132 cm 3 /year vs 1.167 cm 3 /year, p=0.049) growth metrics. Conclusions Germline co-mutations are prevalent in VHL syndrome and define a clinically distinct subset of patients characterised by higher disease penetrance and a more aggressive RCC phenotype. Our findings suggest that co-mutation status is a critical determinant of clinical heterogeneity and a powerful biomarker for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: