Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase 1 trial assesses proglumide's safety and effects on pancreatic tumor environment and pain relief.
Background: The primary aim of this Phase 1 clinical trial was to study the safety and dose of a cholecystokinin receptor antagonist, proglumide, in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB-P) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The secondary aim was to study the effects of proglumide with GEM-NAB-P on the tumor microenvironment (TME) with tumor biopsies and a blood biomarker assay. An exploratory aim studied the effects of proglumide treatment on cancer-related pain. Methods: Gemcitabine-naïve patients were treated with GEM-NAB-P plus proglumide 1200 mg/day. Tumor biopsies and a liquid biopsy serum sample for analysis of a microRNA biomarker panel were collected pre- and on-treatment to study the TME. McGill pain surveys were done at baseline, week 8 and at the end of treatment. The study was approved and registered (NCT05827055). Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.2 years (range 54–74 years). The starting dose was well-tolerated with no unexpected treatment-related adverse events observed. Multiplex immunohistochemical analysis of tumor biopsies at baseline and week 8 revealed a significant reduction in Ki67+ cells, collagen1α1, and M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Week 8 tumor biopsies demonstrated a significant increase in CD8+ T-cells and natural killer cells compared to baseline. The blood biomarker panel showed a significant inverse change in microRNAs associated with decreasing fibrosis and metastasis. The McGill pain scores showed less pain at week 24 or end-of-treatment compared to baseline. Conclusions: Proglumide demonstrates a favorable safety profile when combined with standard chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Its unique ability to remodel TME and alleviate cancer-related pain highlights its potential, warranting further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: