Analysis reveals that voxel size and statistical uncertainty affect surface dose in planning techniques, suggesting optimization opportunities.
Introduction This study aims to analyze the impact of the surface dose at depth (1-5mm) in different planning techniques and immobilization devices by varying the dose-voxel size (DVS) and statistical uncertainty (SU) using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. Methods Three Sets of computed tomography (CT) images were taken from an in-house developed chest phantom, which included an open phantom, a vaclok and a thermoplastic mask. The image sets were pushed to the Monaco planning station for registration and contouring. Six beams of 6 MV photon energy are used to plan an Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique, and a half arc beam is used for Volumetric Modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In each plan, recalculation is performed by changing only the grid size from 1 mm to 8 mm and the statistical uncertainty from 1% to 5% from the parameter control window, keeping the other dose constraints the same. A total of 240 plans were performed for all three image sets together for both the IMRT and VMAT techniques, and the dose at depth was compared and statistically analyzed via the Kruskal–Walli's test. Results The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and V95% target are increased in both IMRT and VMAT, whereas the SU and DVS are reduced. Conclusion Higher statistical uncertainty and grid size significantly reduced dose calculation time, independent of technique or device. surface dose at depth (1-5mm) decreased with increasing grid size and increased with lower statistical uncertainty. IMRT consistently showed higher skin doses than VMAT across all devices, with vac-lock immobilization yielding the highest surface dose in both techniques. These findings show that the surface dose is influenced by beam selection, parameter settings, and the optimization time allocated during treatment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Challapalli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: