Randomized clinical trial evaluates incisor changes after retraction using single versus double wire protocols, indicating similar outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the inclination of incisors after retraction with double wire using double-slot brackets (DSC) versus single wire using single-slot brackets. Materials and Methods Twenty-four patients aged 18 ± 5 years with maxillary anterior proclination requiring extraction of upper first premolars were randomly divided into two groups equally. Group I utilized double wires for retraction in DSCs, whereas Group II received a single wire retraction protocol in single-slot brackets. Pre- and post-retraction cone beam computed tomography scans were compared to assess the changes in inclination, vertical position, anchorage loss, and root resorption between the groups. An independent t -test was done for inter-group comparison, and a paired t -test was done to determine significant changes within the groups. Results Group I revealed a significant reduction in labiolingual inclination by 5.59° ± 6.56°, whereas Group II showed a reduction by 8.02 ± 6.53. The central incisors in Group I showed a vertical change of −1.13 ± 1.34 mm, whereas in Group II, significant vertical changes were limited to the lateral incisors at −1.79 ± 1.35 mm. Inter-group comparisons revealed no significant differences ( P >.05) with respect to torque, anchorage loss, and root resorption. Conclusion The changes in the double-slot group post-retraction were comparable to those in the single-slot group, with no significant statistical difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mairal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: