Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QCM-D evaluates fibrinogen adsorption on polymer surfaces, revealing distinct antithrombogenicity profiles.
To quantitatively evaluate differences in antithrombogenicity, poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA), poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) (PMEA), and poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-co-n-butyl methacrylate) (P(MPC-co-BMA)) were spin-coated on gold QCM-D (Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation) sensors, and the adsorption behaviors of fibrinogen (Fg) on these polymer surfaces was analyzed. The resulting ΔD-Δf plots exhibited clearly the distinct profiles among the polymers: an elastic adsorption state was observed on PBMA, a more viscous adsorption state induced by relatively weak interactions was observed on PMEA, and polymer-based repulsion against Fg was on P(MPC-co-BMA). These results highlight the advantage of the QCM-D technique as an evaluation method for antithrombogenicity and further reveal the differing mechanisms by which PMEA and P(MPC-co-BMA) exhibit their antithrombogenic properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: