This analysis evaluates thermodynamic performance and costs of integrating an energy storage system with a coal plant, suggesting effective strategies for deep peak shaving.
An electrical heating fluidized-bed thermal energy storage (EH-FB-TES) system is proposed for integration with a coal-fired power plant (CFPP) for deep peak shaving (DPS) due to its high energy storage density and extensive heat exchange performance. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the thermodynamic performance and economic feasibility of the integrated EH-FB-TES system, specifically focusing on identifying the optimal coupling and heat recovery strategies for enhanced deep peak shaving performance. Since EH-FB-TES uses air flow for fluidization in the heating storage process, its coupling with the CFPP differs from other TES technologies, and the associated thermodynamic performance and cost are thereby analyzed. The results show that, in EH-FB-TES, the heat release efficiency is predominantly constrained by thermal losses. To increase the energy utilization efficiency, a two-stage heat recovery strategy is proposed to release the stored energy in the integration. The first stage is to heat up the feedwater extracted from the deaerator and the second one is to heat up the condensate water. The analyses also show that the selection of reinjection positions for the heated medium from EH-FB-TES greatly influences the system performance. Returning the stored thermal energy to heat up feedwater can effectively increase the output of the unit, while directly generating steam can be beneficial for coal saving. The integrated system achieves a maximum equivalent round-trip efficiency of 32.9% under 20 MW/800 °C conditions. An economic analysis reveals that, compared with other energy storage methods, EH-FB-TES can realize a relatively high energy storage density with a rather low cost. Under the present DPS compensation policy, for a 315 MW subcritical CFPP integrated with a 50 MW EH-FB-TES system, when heat storage is 8 h, heat release is 4 h per day, and the plant operates 100 days per year, the estimated static and dynamic payback periods are 3.06 years and 3.67 years, respectively. The integration of CFPP with EH-FB-TES could be promising for meeting DSP requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: