Field survey analyzes how family interruptions affect work-life balance in remote work, suggesting leadership adaptations.
Purpose This study analyzes how family-sourced work interruptions (FSWI) influence employees' work-life balance (WLB) in remote work environments, highlighting the interactive roles of polychronicity and temporal leadership as key boundary conditions. Design/methodology/approach A two-stage field survey was conducted among 481 knowledge workers in a voluntary hybrid work arrangement. At Time 1, participants reported FSWI, polychronicity, and temporal leadership; at Time 2, one month later, WLB was measured. The analyses applied a three-way interaction framework to evaluate the conditional effects. Findings Our findings revealed a negative association between FSWI and WLB. The magnitude of this effect was weaker for employees with high polychronicity, reflecting their greater capacity to manage interruptions. Moreover, a significant three-way interaction revealed a compensatory pattern: high temporal leadership buffered the impact of FSWI on employees with low polychronicity. In contrast, low temporal leadership was more beneficial for those with high polychronicity. Originality/value This study addresses a gap in the literature by directly linking FSWI to WLB in remote contexts and conceptualizing FSWI as a persistent structural stressor. It further highlights polychronicity as a critical personal resource and advances a compensatory resource perspective on temporal leadership, clarifying when leader-provided structures strengthen or weaken employee well-being. In doing so, the study extends boundary theory and provides actionable guidance for managers to tailor leadership practices to the temporal orientations of remote workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: