This retrospective study shows that elevated CD73 expression predicts poor survival in biliary tract cancer, suggesting targeted therapeutic strategies may be needed.
Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. CD73 is upregulated under hypoxic conditions and promotes tumor progression. However, its clinical role in BTC and interaction with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between CD73 expression and prognosis in BTC, as well as its impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and TILs. Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent curative BTC surgery at Hokkaido University Hospital between 2018 and 2023. Formalin-fixed tumor specimens were analyzed using DeepPathFinder™ (biomy Inc., Tokyo, Japan), an AI-based digital pathology platform enabling objective quantification of CD73 expression and lymphocyte infiltration within tumoral (T) and stromal (S) compartments. Immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD8, Foxp3, and CD163 was used to identify T-cell subsets and macrophages. Associations between CD73, TIL subsets, and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier, Cox regression, and Spearman correlation analyses. Results: High T-CD73 expression was associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97, p = 0.041), whereas S-CD73 showed no prognostic relevance. Conversely, high S-TIL density was correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.49, p = 0.032). T-CD73 expression was negatively correlated with stromal CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities, indicating selective suppression of stromal cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) infiltration. No significant correlations were observed between Foxp3+ T cells and CD163+ M2 macrophages. Conclusions: CD73 upregulation in tumor cells impairs stromal CTL and TIL activity, leading to a poor prognosis. Spatial distribution, rather than total TIL number, better reflects effective anti-tumor immunity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiratori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: