Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates the environmental and economic benefits of a steel slag-RAP asphalt mixture in highway construction, suggesting low-carbon alternatives.
To address natural aggregate scarcity and improve the high-value utilization of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP), this study proposes a steel slag–RAP hot recycled asphalt mixture (SSRM) as a sustainable alternative to conventional limestone–RAP mixtures (RM). Unlike previous studies mainly focusing on performance verification, an integrated environmental–economic evaluation framework was developed based on real highway expansion project data under a “cradle-to-gate” boundary and incorporating transportation distance thresholds. SSRM containing 50% RAP and 23% steel slag as coarse aggregate replacement was evaluated through rutting, semi-circular bending (SCB), freeze–thaw splitting (TSR), and skid resistance tests. Compared with RM, SSRM exhibited 14–16% higher dynamic stability and 20–25% higher fracture energy at −10 °C, along with improved moisture stability and skid resistance, mainly attributed to the rough and alkaline characteristics of steel slag enhancing adhesion and aggregate interlocking. Life-cycle assessment (GWP100) and cost analysis indicate that SSRM reduces carbon emissions by 10–11% relative to RM and about 40% compared with conventional virgin mixtures, while initial construction costs decrease by 9–10%. Transportation sensitivity analysis identifies equal-emission and equal-cost thresholds of approximately 590 km and 380 km, respectively. Within typical material supply radii (300–400 km), SSRM demonstrates both environmental and economic advantages, providing a practical framework for low-carbon material selection in highway construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: