Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This chapter explores artistic adaptations of Melville's work, demonstrating how size influences contemporary interpretations and artistic endeavors.
The following excerpt from The Melville Effect: A Literary Afterlife Across the Arts (Columbia University Press, March 2026) comes from a chapter titled “Size Matters,” which investigates issues of scale, magnitude, and sublimity that have dominated discussions of Moby-Dick since Melville’s rediscovery in the 1920s. The Melville Effect posits that our century is in the midst of a new Melville revival, one spearheaded by contemporary artists (rather than scholars as in the 1920s) who have made the author into their springboard for risk-taking projects that incorporate multiple genres and modes of media. As the chapter “Size Matters” indicates, many of these artists evince a fascination with size and immensity that mirrors Ahab's monomania; the following pages looks at a precedent for such obsessiveness in the cases of two mid-century modernist artists: Orson Welles and Gilbert Wilson. Their life-long attempts to adapt Melville’s masterpiece to any number of platforms but always falling short sets the stage for analyses of contemporary artists whose equal obsessions lead to a different understanding of sublimity and gigantism altogether.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph Allen Boone (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: