Key result
Ticagrelor fails to meet noninferiority vs prasugrel for ischemic and bleeding outcomes in diabetic multivessel PCI.
Why the study?
The comparative merits of ticagrelor and prasugrel have been debated, particularly in complex diabetic populations with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Does ticagrelor reduce a composite of ischemic and bleeding outcomes compared to prasugrel in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease undergoing PCI?
Does ticagrelor reduce a composite of ischemic and bleeding outcomes compared to prasugrel in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease undergoing PCI?
In patients with diabetes and multivessel disease undergoing PCI, prasugrel may provide better net clinical outcomes than ticagrelor.
Prasugrel preferred to ticagrelor in diabetic multivessel PCI; challenges equivalent net benefit of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.
Patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease represent a high-risk subgroup in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) requiring optimal antiplatelet therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care after percutaneous coronary intervention to prevent stent thrombosis and recurrent ischemic events. Ticagrelor and prasugrel are potent P2Y12 inhibitors that have each demonstrated superior efficacy over clopidogrel in large trials, though their comparative merits have been debated, especially in complex diabetic populations. This review provides background on antiplatelet therapy in ACS, with an emphasis on patients with diabetes and complex coronary anatomy; summarizes key pharmacologic differences and pivotal trial data for ticagrelor and prasugrel (including Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes, TRITON–TIMI 38, and ISAR-REACT 5); and examines the design and findings of the recent TUXEDO-2 trial. TUXEDO-2, conducted in patients with diabetes with multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor failed to meet noninferiority compared with prasugrel for a composite of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. The trial’s results, in context with prior evidence, suggest that prasugrel may provide better net clinical outcomes than ticagrelor in this high-risk group. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings for managing ACS in diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2026) studied this question. Ticagrelor failed to meet noninferiority compared with prasugrel for a composite of ischemic and bleeding outcomes in diabetic patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: