Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates the benefits of agricultural water-saving renovations in an irrigation district, highlighting the impact of precipitation uncertainty.
Global water scarcity constrains sustainable development, and agricultural water-saving renovation is critical for water security, food production and ecological protection. However, existing evaluations rarely incorporate precipitation uncertainty—a core inherent factor in agricultural irrigation—leading to inadequate reflection of real-world comprehensive benefits. This study develops a novel evaluation framework to quantify both deterministic and uncertain benefits of water-saving renovation by integrating ecological service valuation with AI-based cloud model, addressing the above limitation. Validated in Yahekou Irrigation District (a large gravity-fed system in China), the results show that: (1) The water-saving renovation generates an average annual ecological service value of USD 67.58 million, 6.20 times its annual economic cost, highlighting substantial comprehensive benefits; (2) Precipitation amount and its spatiotemporal distribution during crop growing seasons are key determinants of comprehensive benefits—each 1 mm increase in precipitation reduces benefits by USD 1.37 million; (3) The annual comprehensive benefits range from USD 18.27 million to USD 130.90 million with 68.26% reliability. This framework comprehensively quantifies multi-dimensional benefits while accounting for precipitation uncertainty, improving the authenticity and practicality of water-saving benefit assessments. It provides a robust tool for evidence-based decision-making in irrigation district management under changing hydrological conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: