Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical discourse analysis observes ASEAN's evolving discourse on climate, health, and equity, indicating significant shifts.
This paper presents a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of ASEAN Joint Statements on Climate Change delivered at the UNFCCC COP sessions from 2017 to 2024. Using Fairclough's and Dryzek's analytical frameworks, the study interrogates how ASEAN discourse has evolved, particularly in linking climate action with health, pandemics, and equity. Findings indicate a shift from collective appeals grounded in the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) toward a more integrated framing that incorporates public health, socio-economic vulnerabilities, and resilience. The study contributes to literature on regional climate diplomacy by demonstrating ASEAN's growing role in advancing the climate-health-security nexus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mejia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: