Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates an architecture that enhances risk management in information security using AI technologies, indicating improved efficiency.
This paper presents a standard-oriented architecture for automating information security risk management (ISRM) using artificial intelligence. The study first evaluates eight international frameworks (including COBIT 2019, NIST SP 800-53, and ISO 31000) for automation suitability, identifying ISO/IEC 27005 as the optimal structural foundation. Based on these findings, an architecture integrating Natural Language Processing and machine learning to automate risk identification, assessment, and treatment is proposed. A core component is a decision-making module that combines expert reasoning with a Multi-LLM consensus mechanism to ensure reliability. To provide exploratory support for the proposed architecture, a comparative study using five state-of-the-art Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Gemini Advanced, Grok, Microsoft Copilot, and DeepSeek Chat) was conducted on a standardized risk identification task. The results highlight strong cross-model consensus patterns, providing exploratory evidence that LLMs may support expert-informed risk identification and reasoning tasks while acknowledging the current limitations in complex reasoning. This approach proposes a transparent architectural foundation for AI-driven ISRM whose scalability must be established through future prototype-based evaluation, thereby bridging the gap between rigid compliance standards and generative AI capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chalyi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: