Retrospective cohort study finds reduced remission in diabetic patients with membranous nephropathy despite B-cell depletion, suggesting the need for improved treatment strategies.
Background and Hypothesis Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common comorbidities, yet the impact of DM on the response to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in MN remains unclear. We hypothesized that despite comparable B-cell depletion, MN patients with comorbid DM would exhibit a reduced treatment response compared to non-diabetic MN patients. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included adults with primary MN who received at least one complete course of anti-CD20 antibody therapy. Propensity score matching (1:2) was applied based on age, sex, baseline eGFR, urinary protein and PLA2R antibody status. The primary outcome was remission (complete or partial) at 3,6,9,12 months. Secondary outcomes included immunological remission, B-cell depletion, and changes in renal parameters. Multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and subgroup analyses were used to compare outcomes between MN patients with (MN+DM) and without diabetes (MN). Results After matching, 207 patients were included (72MN+DM, 135MN). B-cell depletion and immunological remission rates showed no statistically significant differences between groups over the 12-month follow-up period. However, MN patients had significantly higher overall remission rates at 9 months (94% vs. 77%; OR=4.55, 95% CI=1.52–12.50, P<0.01) and at 12 months (97% vs. 86%; OR=5.26, 95% CI=1.25–20.00, P<0.05). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistently poorer responses in diabetic patients across multiple strata. Safety profiles were similar between groups. Conclusion Despite equivalent B-cell depletion, MN with DM patients show a reduced response to anti-CD20 antibody therapy relative to non-diabetic patients, underscoring that tight glycemic control, early supplementary anti-CD20 dosing for poor response, and combined immunosuppressive regimens may enhance their clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: