Review highlights critical turn in digital humanities, suggesting computing may overshadow interpretation and criticism.
This book analyzes the tensions that arise when the numerical, predictive exactitude of digital computing embraces the humanities. Such tensions are thrown into frequent and sharper relief, whereas the sciences proceed on the basis of skepticism, and the humanities proceed on the basis of interpretation, criticism and dialectical engagement with given issues. In addition, the pervasive nature of digital computing heightens the risk of over-shadowing the humanities. The authors argue for a critical turn in digital humanities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onyekachi Henry Ibekwe (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: