This framework models intrusion impact on presence and latency, suggesting implications for AI ethics in coherence environments.
Structural Intelligence SI distinguishes cheap coherence from contact and defines intelligence as answerable revision under constraint. Yet a persistent anomaly remains. Individuals can achieve high insight and even substantial contact while staying trapped in replay, projection, identity fog, and internal prosecution. This paper introduces a missing variable that completes the dynamics: Intrusion I, defined as Foreign Agency Load, the degree to which attention and action selection are occupied by a self-sustaining control loop that behaves phenomenologically as not me. I formalize presence as a stability regime of the agent environment feedback loop. I model Intrusion as occupancy mixture control and as a disturbance that increases Latency L and Actorhood A while reducing effective Pilot access ω. I integrate Intrusion into a complete Presence Equation consistent with the SI corpus. I then derive operational diagnostics, a five-step intervention sequence, and testable predictions. Finally, I discuss implications for AI ethics in cheap coherence environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vladisav Jovanovic (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: