Phenomenological model reveals dark energy dynamics via energy exchange, suggesting implications for Hubble tension.
Version 1.1 — 20 March 2026 (extends v1.0 from 17 March 2026) New in this version: numerical background integration via Runge–Kutta (DOP853), first χ² fit to 29 cosmic chronometer H(z) measurements (χ²/dof = 0.59), χ² contour map over (λ_eff, H₀), parameter uncertainty estimates, Hubble tension discussion, and a portable Python script reproducing all figures. --- I present a phenomenological toy model in which dark energy and cyclic cosmological evolution emerge from energy exchange between two coupled Friedmann–Robertson–Walker sectors. The observable sector x and a hidden partner sector y interact through Q = λH_x ρ_y, producing an effective dark energy component with equation of state w_eff = −1 − λρ_y/(3ρ_de) < −1 without phantom fields, driven by a closed feedback loop between energy density, expansion rate, and energy transfer. Combined with a loop-quantum-cosmology bounce, the model admits non-singular cyclic dynamics. In this version (v1.1), the background equations are integrated numerically. The observable sector is decomposed into standard matter (Ω_m = 0.30, fixed) and a coupling-driven dark energy component. A χ² fit to 29 cosmic chronometer H(z) measurements yields best-fit effective coupling λ_eff ≡ λ·r₀ = 0.30, H₀ = 69.6 km/s/Mpc, and χ²/dof = 0.59. A χ² contour map over (λ_eff, H₀) shows the model prefers H₀ between the Planck value and the SH0ES measurement, suggesting a possible connection to the Hubble tension. The model predicts w_eff(z=0) < −1, consistent with recent hints from DESI 2024.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finn Lennard Jacobsen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: