This approach integrates machine learning and heuristics to enhance scam detection, suggesting significant interpretability gains.
Scam and phishing detection systems typically rely on rigid heuristic rules or opaque large language models. This paper presents ScamShield: a hybrid, interpretable pipeline combining a 24-feature supervised machine learning model, an LLM semantic safety layer, and rule-based heuristics in a unified ensemble. Evaluated on a synthetic benchmark of 19,992 messages spanning 17 scam categories and validated on the UCI SMS Spam Collection (5,574 real-world messages), ScamShield achieves cross-validated F1 = 0.9969 ± 0.0004 on the synthetic benchmark and F1 = 0.9303 ± 0.0098 on real-world data — competitive with fine-tuned DistilBERT (estimated F1 ≈ 0.97–0.99) while requiring 125× less storage, operating at sub-5 ms inference latency, and providing full per-prediction interpretability via coefficient attribution. Statistical significance is confirmed by McNemar's test against all four baselines (p < 0.001). Adversarial evaluation reveals recall drops of 71–82% under obfuscation attacks, identifying semantic embeddings and character-level robustness as the primary improvement directions. Index Terms— Scam Detection, Interpretable ML, Feature Engineering, Gradient Boosting, Ensemble Systems, LLM Safety, Adversarial Robustness, McNemar's Test, Phishing Classification, Probability Calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vishwajeet shashikant adkine (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: