Review analyzes oxy-fuel combustion effects on carbon capture in circulating fluidized beds, highlighting challenges and future strategies.
To address global carbon reduction demands, oxy-fuel combustion in circulating fluidized beds (oxy-CFB) has emerged as a highly promising carbon capture technology, offering extensive fuel flexibility and facilitating bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). However, its commercialization is hindered by significant energy penalties and complex scale-up challenges. This review comprehensively analyzes the fundamental multiphase mechanisms, heat transfer behaviors, and multi-pollutant emission characteristics of oxy-CFB systems, drawing upon multiscale modeling advancements and operational data from pilot to 30 MWth industrial demonstrations. Replacing air with an O2/CO2/H2O mixture fundamentally alters gas–solid hydrodynamics and char conversion pathways, necessitating active fluidization state re-specification. Despite shifting optimal desulfurization temperatures and introducing recarbonation risks, the technology demonstrates inherent advantages in synergistic pollutant control, including the complete elimination of thermal NOx. While atmospheric oxy-CFB is technically viable, transitioning to pressurized operation is critical to minimizing system efficiency penalties. Furthermore, integrating oxygen carrier-aided combustion (OCAC) and developing advanced predictive control strategies are essential to managing multi-module thermal inertia and enabling rapid dynamic responsiveness for modern power grids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: