Comparative cross-sectional study finds higher diastasis recti prevalence in women after caesarean sections, suggesting targeted interventions are needed.
Background: Diastatic recti abdominis (DRA), defined as the abdominis muscles along the linea alba, is a common postpartum musculoskeletal condition. The mode of delivery may impact both its prevalence and severity, division of rectus affecting core stability, functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: To evaluate and compare the prevalence and severity of DRA among postpartum women following vaginal delivery and caesarean section. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 postpartum women (100 vaginal delivery, 150 caesarean section) between 6-12 weeks post-delivery. DRA was assessed systematic palpatory assessment at three points (2 cm above the umbilicus, at the umbilicus, and 2 cm below) and established with Finger width measurement. Severity was classified as mild (2-3 cm), moderate (3-5 cm), or severe (>5 cm). Prevalence and severity were compared between groups using Chi-square and statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: The prevalence of DRA was statistically significantly higher in the caesarean section group (78%) compared to the vaginal delivery group (54%, p < 0.001). Mean value inter-recti distance at the umbilicus was also greater in the caesarean section (3.3 ± 0.7 cm) than in the vaginal delivery group (2.5 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001). Moderate to severe DRA was primarily identified in the caesarean section study sample, in contrast, mild DRA was more common among vaginal delivery participants. Conclusion: Mode of delivery markedly impact both the prevalence and severity of DRA. Early post-delivery examination and focused core rehabilitation interventions are advised to re-establish abdominal integrity, enhance functional outcomes, and decrease prolonged musculoskeletal dysfunction complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeyalakshmi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: