Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel scale assesses self-dehumanization in psychosis with strong validity, highlighting links to identity and self-compassion.
Background and Hypothesis Self-dehumanization is the experience of feeling less or other than human, and is known to be experienced by people with psychosis. Existing measures of self-dehumanization are limited in their applicability to psychosis, and have not been developed with people with lived experience. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a measure of self-dehumanization in psychosis in partnership with key stakeholder groups. Study Design Firstly, domains were specified based on review of existing theories of self-dehumanization and qualitative research on self-dehumanization in psychosis. Secondly, items were generated from a systematic literature review of existing measures of self-dehumanization, transcripts from qualitative research on self-dehumanization in psychosis, and lived experience consultations. Third, items were reduced and revised in a Delphi study (n = 49). Fourth, cognitive interviews (n = 9) were conducted to improve comprehensibility and further revise items. Finally, in psychometric validation, the DiPS underwent exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, item reduction, and reliability and validity assessment (n = 456). Study Results The 13-item DiPS was developed. Both two- and four-factor solutions were tested; the four-factor solution, comprising Humanity, Identity, Personhood, and Agency, demonstrated optimal fit. The DiPS showed strong construct validity, correlating positively with internalized stigma, paranoid thoughts, and voice-hearing, and negatively with self-compassion. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were excellent. Conclusions The DiPS is a reliable and valid measure of self-dehumanization in psychosis. This novel measure can be used in research and clinical practice to better understand distress in psychosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: