Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conversation analysis reveals clients show high cooperativeness when generating solutions in coaching contexts.
While solution generation and question-answer sequences are key to change in coaching, little is known about the role of questions with a solution-oriented agenda. Even less research exists on clients’ (cooperative) responding activities. To breach this gap, we used Conversation Analysis to investigate responses to wh-questions for solution generation with a special focus on the continuum of (dis-)aligning and (dis-)affiliating responses and the degrees of clients’ (un-)cooperativeness. The sequential analysis yielded five response categories: “no(n) answer,” “repair initiation,” “not answering and refocusing,” “answering” and “extended answering.” While the response possibility space includes a range of (un-)cooperative reactions, clients display an overall willingness to answer questions with a solution-generating function: “answering” and “extended answering” make up 68.9% of responses. Additionally, in-depth analyses revealed further cooperative behaviors. Apart from their interactional cooperativeness, this suggests an interaction-type specific readiness of coaching clients to participate in their own change process, that is, an institutional cooperativeness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleischhacker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: