Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A two-stage framework optimizes predictive maintenance scheduling in industrial settings, demonstrating reduced failure and costs.
Predictive maintenance (PdM) has seen significant advances through machine learning, yet its practical deployment remains challenged by data scarcity, system complexity, and uncertainty in cost-related decisions. The majority of current PdM strategies are concerned with enhancing Remaining Useful Life. Prediction accuracy of (RUL) in isolation and with maintenance scheduling as a problem (secondary or fixed). This study proposes a component based, decision oriented predictive maintenance (PdM) approach that links Remaining Useful Life (RUL) to optimization of maintenance. The two-stage framework proposed anticipates the component-specific RUL prediction where Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models was used to predict the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of individual components. To address sparsity in failure data, Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) were utilised to fill in run-to-failure sequences, stabilizing downstream modeling. In the second step, similar components in terms of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) degradation are clustered together by Density-Based Clustering Space (DBSCAN), which allows opportunistic maintenance. A decision on maintenance is then optimized cost-conscious grid search which works on fitted RUL distributions and a normalized. Not only based on point RUL estimates, but on a risk proxy. Empirical experimentation across multiple industrial components of a water bottling plant system indicates that the proposed approach continually reduces corrective failures and normalized maintenance costs as opposed to non-clustering approaches such as random choice and fixed choice of maintenance point. Sensitivity analysis also indicates that the optimal maintenance levels be consistent over a vast spectrum of cost assumptions, which emphasizes the resilience of the structure in economic uncertainty. Overall, this study contributes a robust and scalable maintenance literature that combines data augmentation, component based clustering, and risk aware optimization. This helps advance predictive maintenance practices into a more practical, cost aware decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali H. Hakami (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: