Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This investigation evaluates MRI visibility and relaxation times in 3-D printed thermoplastics, indicating their suitability for MRI applications.
The increasing interest in, and affordability of, 3-D printing has made fast prototyping and manufacturing of components and accessories increasingly popular in MRI research. In this work, visibility in magnetic resonance images and T 1 and T 2 ∗ relaxation times of 3-D printed thermoplastic materials were investigated with multi-band sweep imaging with Fourier transformation (MB-SWIFT) and single point imaging (SPI). Ten commonly available 3-D printable plastics were investigated at 9.4 T. T 1 relaxation times were estimated with inversion recovery (IR-LL) and saturation recovery Look-Locker (SR-LL) as well as variable flip angle (VFA) MB-SWIFT techniques. T 2 ∗ relaxation times were estimated from SPI data. It was observed that acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and some poly(lactic acid) (PLA) -based filaments as well as a proprietary thermoplastic formulation generated detectable signal making them “MRI-visible”. Glycol-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PET-G) and nylon -based filaments as well as some PLA formulations were observed to be “MRI-invisible” with minimal to non-existent signal. T 1 parameters were estimated to be between 463 and 773 ms (VFA), 520–1004 ms (IR-LL) and 222–296 ms (SR-LL). Average T 2 ∗ relaxation times with SPI were between 69 and 273 μs. The results provide a quantitative basis for selecting fused deposition modeling (FDM) materials for ultrashort echo time MRI applications and highlight the importance of both pulse sequence and material composition when designing MRI-compatible structures. • Ultrashort echo time MRI was used to characterize visibility and relaxation of common 3-D printed FDM thermoplastics: with ASA, ABS, HIPS and a proprietary filament clearly MRI-visible while PET-G, PC and nylon formulations were less MRI-visible. • Observed T1 relaxation times were sequence-dependent between 222 and 1004 ms. • Observed T2* relaxation times were 69–273 μs; T2* for PET-G, PC-Plus and Nylon 2 could not be reliably quantified. • Results may be used for application-specific selection of suitable FDM material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuomainen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: