Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study validates the LoAD-Q for assessing drinking behaviours, suggesting its use for interventions.
Researching alcohol-related addictive behaviours typically utilises questionnaires which measure a drinker’s level of alcohol use. However, these questionnaires typically either rely on a participant reporting the amount of alcohol they drink in units or a measure of disorderly drinking behaviour. Such measures do not necessarily capture the essence of drinking behaviours in the general population. This study aimed to validate a new alcohol drinking questionnaire and evaluate its internal consistency, factor structure, and test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 3-component structure, with the dimensions of emotional, external, and restrained drinking emerging as the primary constructs. Cronbach’s alpha values indicated good to excellent internal consistency ranging from α=.76 to α=.97 across its subscales. Test-retest reliability was high, with Pearson’s coefficients showing significant correlations between all test-retest items (p<.001). These findings suggest that the new questionnaire may be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring drinking behaviours. The questionnaire may offer a novel framework for categorising drinking behaviours and has the potential to inform interventions aimed at reducing harmful alcohol use. • Introduces the LoAD-Q, a novel self-report questionnaire for assessing emotional, external, and restrained drinking behaviours. • Exploratory factor analysis revealed a clear and robust three-component structure for the drinking behaviours measured. • The LoAD-Q demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including good to excellent internal consistency and high test-retest reliability. • This new instrument offers a valuable framework for categorising drinking behaviours with potential to inform targeted interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilcockson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: